Archive for Spotlight
OF THOSE WHO WERE ENGAGED in the revival of Freemasonry in the beginning of the 18th century, none performed a more important part than he to whom may be well applied the epithet of the Father of Modern Speculative Masonry, and to whom, perhaps, more than any other person, is the present Grand Lodge of England indebted for its existence.
A sketch of his life, drawn from the scanty materials to be found in Masonic records, and in the brief notices of a few of his contemporaries, cannot fail to be interesting to the student of Masonic history.
The Reverend John Theophilus Desaguliers (pronounced day-za-güly-ay), was born on March 12, 1683, at Rochelle in France. He was the son of a French Protestant clergyman; and, his father having removed to England as a refugee on the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, he was educated at Christ Church, Oxford, where he took lessons of the celebrated Keill in experimental philosophy.
In 1712 he received the degree of Master of Arts, and in the same year succeeded Dr. Keill as a lecturer on experimental philosophy at Hert Hall (now Hertford College).
In 1713 he removed to Westminster, where he continued his course of lectures, being the first one, it is said, who ever lectured upon physical science in the metropolis.
At this time he attracted the notice and secured the friendship of Sir Isaac Newton. His reputation as a philosopher obtained for him a fellowship in the Royal Society. He was also about this time admitted to clerical orders, and appointed by the Duke of Chandos his chaplain, who also presented him to the living of Whit church.
In 1718 he received from the University of Oxford the degree of Doctor of Civil Law, and was presented by the Earl of Sunderland to a living in Norfolk, which he afterward exchanged for one in Essex. He maintained, however, his residence in London, where he continued to deliver his lectures until his death in 1744.
His contributions to science consist of a “Treatise on the Construction of Chimneys (translated from the French and published in 1716);” Lectures of Experimental Philosophy, of which a second edition was issued in 1719; A Course of Experimental Philosophy, in 2 volumes, published in 1734; and in 1735 he edited and edition of Gregory’s Elements of Catoptrics and Dioptrics. He also translated from the Latin Gravesandes’ Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy.
In the clerical profession he seems not to have been an ardent worker, and his theological labors were confined to the publication of a single sermon on repentance. He was in fact more distinguished as a scientist than as a clergyman, and Priestly calls him “an indefatigable experimental philosopher.”
It is, however, as a Mason that Dr. Desaguliers will most attract our attention. But nothing is known as to his connection with Freemasonry until 1719, when he was elevated to the throne of the Grand Lodge, succeeding George Payne, and being thus the third Grand Master after the revival.
He paid much attention to the interests of the Fraternity, and so elevated the character of the Order, that the records of the Grand Lodge show that during his administration several of the older brethren who had hitherto neglected the Craft resumed their visits to the Lodges, and many noblemen were initiated into the Institution.
Dr. Desaguliers was peculiarly zealous in the investigation and collection of the old records of the society, and to him we are principally indebted for the preservation of the “Charges of a Freemason” and the preparation of the “General Regulations,” which are found in the first edition of the Constitutions; which, although attributed to Dr. Anderson, were undoubtedly compiled under the supervision of Desaguliers.
Anderson, we suppose, did the work, while Desaguliers furnished much of the material and the thought.
One of the first controversial works in favor of Freemasonry, namely “A Detection of Dr. Plots’ Account of the Freemasons,” was also attributed to his pen; but he is said to have repudiated the credit of its authorship, of which indeed the paper furnishes no internal evidence.
In 1721 he delivered before the Grand Lodge what the records call “an eloquent oration about Masons and Masonry.” It does not appear it was ever published; at least no copy of it is extant, although Kloss puts the title at the head of his “Catalogue of Masonic Orations.”
It is, indeed, the first Masonic address of which we have any notice, and would be highly interesting, because it would give us, in all probability, as Kloss remarks, the views of the Masons of that day in reference to the design of the Institution.
After his retirement from the office of Grand Master in 1720, Desaguliers was thrice appointed Deputy Grand Master: in 1723, by the Duke of Wharton; in June of the same year, by the Earl of Dalkeith; in 1725, by Lord Paisley; and during this period of service he did many things for the benefit of the Craft, among others, initiating that scheme of charity which was subsequently developed in what is now known in the Grand Lodge of England as the Fund of Benevolence.
After this, Dr. Desaguliers passed over to the Continent, and resided for a few years in Holland. In 1731, he was at The Hague, and presided as Worshipful Master of a Lodge organized under a special dispensation for the purpose of initiating and passing the Duke of Lorraine, who was subsequently Grand Duke of Tuscany, and then Emperor of Germany. The Duke was, during the same year, made a Master Mason in England.
On his return to England, Desaguliers was considered from his position in Masonry, as the most fitting person to confer the degrees on the Prince of Wales, who was accordingly entered, passed, and raised in an occasional Lodge, held on two occasions at Kew, over which Dr. Desaguilers presided as Master.
Dr. Desaguilers was very attentive to his Masonic duties, and punctual in his attendance on the communications of the Grand Lodge. His last recorded appearance by name is on February 8, 1742, a few years before his death.
Of Desaguilers’ Masonic and personal character, Dr. Oliver gives, from tradition, the following description:
“There were many traits in his character that redound to his immortal praise. He was a grave man in private life, almost approaching to austerity; but he could relax in the private recesses of a Tyled Lodge, and in company with brothers and fellows, where the ties of social intercourse are not particularly stringent. He considered the proceedings of the Lodge as strictly confidential; and being persuaded that his brothers by initiation actually occupied the same position as brothers by blood, he was undisguisedly free and familiar in the mutual interchange of unrestrained courtesy. In the Lodge he was jocose and free-hearted, sang his song, and had no objection to his share of the bottle, although one of the most learned and distinguished men of his day (excerpt from the Revelations of a Square, p. 10).”
In 1713, Desaguilers had married a daughter of William Pudsey, Esq., by whom he had two sons – Alexander, who was a clergyman; and Thomas, who went into the army, and became a colonel of artillery and an equerry to George III.
The latter days of Dr. Desaguilers are said to have been clouded with sorrow and poverty. De Feller, in the “Biographie Universelle,” says that he became insane, dressing sometimes as a harlequin, and sometimes as a clown, and that in one of these fits of insanity he died.
And Cawthorn, in a poem entitled “The Vanity of Human Enjoyments,” intimates in the following lines that Desaguilers was in very necessitous circumstances at the time of his death:
“How poor, neglected Desaguilers fell!
How he, who taught 2 gracious kings to view
All Boyle ennobled and all Bacon knew,
Died in a cell, without a friend to save,
Without a guinea, and without a grave.”
But the accounts of the French biographer and the English poet are most probably both apocryphal, or, at least, much exaggerated; for Nichols, who knew him personally, and has given a fine portrait of him in the ninth volume of his “Literary Anecdotes,” says that he died on February 29, 1744, at the Bedford Coffee House, and was buried in the Savoy.
Too few Masons of the present day, except to those who have made Freemasonry a subject of special study, is the name of Desaguilers very familiar.
But it is well they should know that to him, perhaps, more than to any other man, are we indebted for the present existence of Freemasonry as a living institution, for it was his learning and social position that gave a standing to the Institution, which brought to its support noblemen and men of influence, so that the insignificant assemblage of four London Lodges at the Apple-Tree Tavern has expanded into an association which now overshadows the entire civilized world.
And the moving spirit of all this was Brother John Theophilus Desaguilers.
BROTHER BENJAMIN FRANKLIN led a remarkable life. He was born in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, on January 6, 1706. He was a revolutionary, a scientist, an inventor, a statesman, and a Mason.
He was most probably initiated in 1731 in the St. John’s Lodge at Philadelphia. In 1734 he was elected Grand Master of the Provincial Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania; and in November of the same year Franklin applied to Henry Price, who had received from England authority to establish Masonry in this country, for a confirmation of those powers conferred by the first deputation of warrant.
It is probable that the request was granted, although no record of the fact can be found. In 1734, Brother Franklin edited an edition of Anderson’s Constitutions, which was probably the first Masonic work published in America.
In 1743, He was appointed Provincial Grand Master of Pennsylvania by Thomas Oxnard, who, also on that same year, was appointed Grand Master of all North America.
While Franklin was in France as the Ambassador from this country, he appears to have taken much interest in Masonry.
He affiliated with the celebrated Lodge of the Nine Sisters, of which Lalande, Count de Gebelin, and other celebrities of French Literature, were members.
He took a prominent part in the initiation of Voltaire, and on the French philosopher’s death, acted as Senior Warden of the Lodge of Sorrow held in his memory.
The Lodge of the Nine Sisters held Brother Franklin in such esteem that it struck a medal in his honor, of which a copy, supposed to be the only one now in existence, belongs to the Provincial Grand Lodge of Mecklenburg.
But if Ben Franklin was such an active Mason, why didn’t he mention the Fraternity in his Autobiography, and why wasn’t he buried with Masonic honors?
In Prof. Steven Bullock’s book entitled “Revolutionary Brotherhood,” he proposed that the answer lies on the fact that Brother Franklin was affiliated with the Grand Lodge of Moderns.
The first Ancient’s lodge was formed in Philadelphia in 1757, and by the end of the Revolutionary War, the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania was controlled by Ancients.
According to Bullock: “By the time Franklin returned from England for good in 1785, he could not enter a Pennsylvania Lodge. The Grand Lodge he had headed no longer existed, and its past grand master could not even set foot in a lodge room without a ceremony of ‘healing’ to convert him from an unacceptable Modern Mason into an Ancient brother.”
While he never said anything explicitly, Brother Franklin probably disassociated himself from the Ancients, and they refused to acknowledge or bury “an unacceptable Modern Mason.”
Thus, we see the bitter fruits of pride and rigid legalism.
On his impression about Freemasonry, Bro. Franklin wrote:
“Freemasonry has tenets peculiar to itself.
They serve as testimonials of character and qualifications,
which are only conferred after due course of instruction and examination.
These are of no small value; they speak a universal language, and act as a passport
to the attentions and support of the initiated in all parts of the world.
They cannot be lost as long as memory retains its power.
Let the possessor of them be expatriated, shipwrecked or imprisoned,
let him be stripped of everything he has got in the world,
still those credentials remain, and are available for use as circumstances require.
The good effects they have produced are established by the most incontestable facts of history.
They have stayed the uplifted hand of the destroyer;
they have softened the asperities of the tyrant;
they have mitigated the horrors of captivity;
they have subdued the rancour of malevolence;
and broken down the barriers of political animosity and sectarian alienation.
On the field of battle, in the solitudes of the uncultivated forest,
or in the busy haunts of the crowded city, they have made men of the most hostile feelings,
the most distant regions, and diversified conditions, rush to the aid of each other, and feel a special joy and satisfaction that they have been able to afford relief to a Brother Mason.”
— Benjamin Franklin
BROTHER WASHINGTON was born at Bridges Creek, Westmoreland County, Virginia on February 22, 1732, of the present calendar, but February 11, 1731 on his birth record. At age sixteen he became a surveyor on the estate of Lord Fairfax, then joined the army and later was on the staff of General Braddock.
Delegate to the First and Second Continental Congresses, he was unanimously chosen in 1775 as Commander-in-Chief of the Colonial Army and his Yorktown campaign ended the war on October 19, 1781, with the surrender of Lord Cornwallis and the British Army.
Washington presided at the Federal Convention in Philadelphia on May, 1787 for the framing of the Constitution and was elected President. In 1792 he was re-elected but refused a third term. He returned to his Mount Vernon estate as a farmer, his true ambition.
The Oath of office as President of the United States was administered on April 30, 1789 at New York City to General Washington, by Brother Robert R. Livingston, Chancellor of the State of New York, and who also was the Grand Master of Masons.
The name of Washington occupies a prominent place in Masonic biography, not solely because of the services he provided for the Institution, either as a worker or writer, but because of his connection with the Craft which is a source of pride to every American Freemason, at least, who can thus call the “Father of his Country” a Brother.
Washington was initiated, in 1752, in the Lodge at Fredicksburg, Virginia, and the records of that Lodge, still in existence, present the following entries on the subject.
The first entry is thus: “Nov. 4th 1752. This evening Mr. George Washington was initiated as an Entered Apprentice.” The receipt of the entrance fee, amounting to £23s., was acknowledged.
On March 3rd of the following year, “Mr. George Washington” is recorded as “having been passed a Fellow Craft,” and on August 4, same year, 1753, the record of the transactions of the evening state that “Mr. George Washington,” and others whose names are mentioned, “have been raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason.”
After the Revolutionary War, there was a strong movement to unite the nation’s Freemasons under a national Grand Lodge of the United States, and Washington was offered the position of national Grand Master which he refused.
We next hear of Washington’s official connection in the year 1788.
Lodge No. 39, at Alexandria, which had hitherto been working under the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania, in 1788 transferred its allegiance to Virginia. On May 29 in that year the Lodge adopted the following resolution:
“The Lodge proceeded to the appointment of Master and Deputy Master to be recommended to the Grand Lodge of Virginia, when George Washington, Esq., was unanimously chosen Master; Robert McCrea, Deputy Master; Wm. Hunter, Jr., Senior Warden; John Allison, Junior Warden. And the Charter or Warrant under which the Lodge is still working is granted to Washington as Master.”
When the new Capitol City that would eventually bear his name was designed under his watchful eye, Freemasons laid a cornerstone of the new Capitol building in 1793, over which Washington presided in full Masonic regalia.
On December 14, 1799, he died at Mt. Vernon, Fairfax County in Virginia, about 15 miles from Washington, District of Columbia.